Oral squamous cell cancer: early detection and the role of alcohol and smoking

Objective: Oral squamous cell carcinoma has a remarkable incidence worldwide and a fairly onerous prognosis, encouraging further research on factors that might modify disease outcome. Data sources: A web-based search for all types of articles published was initiated using Medline/Pub Med, with the key words such as oral cancer, alcohol consumption, genetic polymorphisms, tobacco smoking and prevention. The search was restricted to articles published in English, with no publication date restriction (last update 2010). Review Methods: In this review article, we approach the factors for a cytologic diagnosis during OSCC development and the markers used in modern diagnostic technologies as well. We also reviewed available studies of the combined effects of alcohol drinking and genetic polymorphisms on alcohol-related cancer risk. Results: The interaction of smoking and alcohol significantly increases the risk for aero-digestive cancers. The interaction between smoking and alcohol consumption seems to be responsible for a significant amount of disease. Conclusion: Published scientific data show promising pathways for the future development of more effective prognosis. There is a clear need for new prognostic indicators, which could be used in diagnostics and, therefore a better selection of the most effective treatment can be achieved

Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity

Oral cancer represents a common entity comprising a third of all head and neck malignant tumors. The options for curative treatment of oral cavity cancer have not changed significantly in the last three decades; however, the work up, the approach to surveillance, and the options for reconstruction have evolved significantly. Because of the profound functional and cosmetic importance of the oral cavity, management of oral cavity cancers requires a thorough understanding of disease progression, approaches to management and options for reconstruction. The purpose of this review is to discuss the most current management options for oral cavity cancers

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 and Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-analysis Implementing a Mendelian Randomization Approach

Alcohol drinking at high doses is a risk factor for head and neck cancer, and exposure to acetaldehyde, the principle metabolite of alcohol, is supposed to account for the increased risk. Individuals homozygous for the *2 variant allele of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) are unable to metabolize acetaldehyde, which prevents them from alcohol drinking, whereas *1*2 have 6-fold higher blood acetaldehyde concentration postalcohol consumption with respect to *1*1. According to the concept of Mendelian randomization, because this polymorphism is distributed randomly during gamete formation, its association with head and neck cancer should be not confounded by smoking. We carried out a meta-analysis of ALDH2 and head and neck cancer searching for relevant studies on Medline and Embase up to January 31, 2008, and investigated the consistency between the expected odds ratio (OR) among drinkers from the largest pooled analysis among never smokers and the observed OR from this meta-analysis by an interaction test. Six studies were selected (945 cases, 2,917 controls). The OR of head and neck cancer among *2*2 was 0.53 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.28-1.00] relative to *1*1 and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.21-2.77) among *1*2. The expected OR for head and neck cancer due to alcohol intake among *1*1 was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.88-2.1.7) and the observed OR among *1*1 compared with 2*2 from this meta-analysis was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.003.57; P for interaction = 0.43). Besides showing the effectiveness of the Mendelian randomization approach, these findings support the theory that alcohol increases head and neck cancer risk through the carcinogenic action of acetaldehyde. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(1):248-54

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 and head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis implementing a mendelian randomization approach

Alcohol drinkinga thigh doses is a risk factor for head and neck cancer, and exposure to acetaldehyde, the principle metabolite of alcohol, is supposed to account for the increased risk. Individuals homozygous for the *2 variant allele of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) are unable tometabolize acetaldehyde, which prevents them from alcohol drinking, whereas *1*2 have 6-fold higher blood acetaldehyde concentration postalcohol consumption with respect to *1*1. Accordingto the concept of Mendelian randomization, because this polymorphism is distributed randomly duringg amete formation, its association with head and neck cancer should be not confounded by smoking. We carried out a meta-analysis of ALDH2 and head and neck cancer searchingfo r relevant studies on Medline and Embase up to January 31, 2008, and investigated the consistency between the expected odds ratio (OR) amongd rinkers from the largest pooled analysis amongne ver smokers and the observed OR from thismeta-analysis by an interaction test. Six studies were selected (945 cases, 2,917 controls). The OR of head and neck cancer among *2*2 was 0.53 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.28-1.00] relative to *1*1 and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.21-2.77) among *1*2. The expected OR for head and neck cancer due to alcohol intake among *1*1 was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.88-2.17) and the observed OR among *1*1 compared with 2*2 from this meta-analysis was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.00-3.57; P for interaction = 0.43). Besides showing the effectiveness of the Mendelian randomization approach, these findings support the theory that alcohol increases head and neck cancer risk through the carcinogenic action of acetaldehyde. Copyright \ua9 2009 American Association for Cancer Research

Valor prognóstico da espessura tumoral no carcinoma epidermóide de boca e orofaringe

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o significado prognóstico da espessura tumoral no carcinoma epidermóide de boca e orofaringe. MÉTODO: Foram avaliados retrospectivamente 112 pacientes atendidos entre janeiro de 1990 e dezembro de 1994, dos quais foram selecionados 84 casos com amostras teciduais disponíveis. A medida da espessura foi realizada à microscopia óptica com ocular milimetrada, considerando a maior medida perpendicular à superfície. RESULTADOS: A incidência de metástases ocultas foi de 7% nos tumores menos espessos do que 3mm e 50% naqueles com espessura igual ou superior a 5mm. As margens cirúrgicas estiveram comprometidas com maior freqüência nos pacientes com espessura tumoral maior ou igual a 5mm, mas a espessura não identificou os pacientes com maior risco de recidiva local. CONCLUSÃO: A espessura tumoral auxilia a identificar os pacientes com carcinoma epidermóide de boca e orofaringe com maior risco de metastatização oculta